RAMPATI DEVI v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 325, 341, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
DUDHNATH MISHRA SON OF LATE SUDAMA MISHRA Resident of Village - Gandaman, P.S.- Mashrakh, Distt.- Saran. The State of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ====================================================== CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23533 of 2022 ... ... Opposite Party/s
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2021 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== BHOLA KUMAR MISHRA S/o Dudhnath Mishra Resident of Village- Gandaman, P.S.- Mashrakh, District- Saran. The State of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 52019 of 2021) : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23533 of 2022) Mr.Arvind Kumar Sinha For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR Mr.Shrinath Manjhi Mr.Yogendra Kumar ORAL ORDER 3 12-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case no.
143/2021 instituted for the offence Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52019 of 2021(3) dt.12-07-2022 under Sections 341, 307, 323, 325, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution story relates to abuse and assault to the informant and his brother by the petitioners and other co- accused persons. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties have received injuries in alleged occurrence. They have got no criminal antecedent. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against them. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case no.
143/2021 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52019 of 2021(3) dt.12-07-2022 amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Saran at Chapra subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. sushma/- U (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.