✦ Patna High Court

BABUJAN ANSARI v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23565 of 2023PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mrs. Rashmi Jha Mr.Abhishek Kumar Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 27-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 457, 380 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Nesar Alam, who was apprehended on spot. Save and except confessional statement of co-accused, there is no other material against this petitioner to show his complicity in the aforesaid crime. No stolen article has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Petitioner has got clean antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23565 of 2023(2) dt.27-06-2023 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No. 73 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 380, 457; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23565 of 2023). ← Search more judgments