Aditya Singh v. The State of Bihar through Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 30 Aug 2013
- Bench
- BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anant Bijay Singh For the Respondent No.1 & 2 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, SC- 27 Mr. R. K. Sharma, AC to SC-27 For the Respondent No. 3 to 5: Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-08-2013 By the impugned order dated 17.06.1992 (Annexure-1) passed in Consolidation Revision No. 1207 of 1989 by the respondent Joint Director of Consolidation (Headquarter), Patna, draft consolidation scheme regarding allotment of chaks to the raiyats has been directed to be restored. After having heard the parties and going through the record as also on perusal of the impugned revisional order dated 17.06.1992 (Annexure-1), this Court does not find any legal infirmity or procedural irregularity warranting any interference by this Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In the result, the writ petition has to fail and is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. BTiwary/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 30 Aug 2013. The bench was BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.