✦ Patna High Court · 02 Feb 2024

Pankaj Kumar Singh v. M/s Vision Land Pvt. Ltd., a private Limited Company registered under

AT PATNA REQUEST CASE No. 41 of 2023CHIEF3 min read

Case at a glance

Order date
02 Feb 2024
Bench
CHIEF

Outcome

Disposed of

The Request Petition stands disposed of in the

Key paragraphs

  • Para 1515. The Request Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) sharun/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

Judgment

2.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus M/s Vision Land Pvt. Ltd., a private Limited Company registered under Companies Act, 1956 having registration No.- U45201BR2008 PTC 013450 through its Managing Director, Shree Harsh Kumar Singh, Son of Shree Rajendra Prasad Singh, resident of Rupak Cinema Campus, Bairi Path, Post- Kadamkuaon, District- Patna- 800003, Mobile No.- [REDACTED] and Present Postal address as Vision Rupak Ground Floor, Bairi Path, Dunda Shahi Complex, P.O.- Kadamkuaon, P.S.- Kadamkuaon, Patna- 800003. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-02-2024

Mr. Saurabh Bishwambhar, Advocate Mr. : : Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This application has been moved seeking appointment of an Arbitrator invoking the powers of this Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

3.

Petitioner and the respondent entered into an agreement dated 25.02.2010 (Annexure-1). The petitioner invoked the arbitration clause vide communication dated

30.01.2023, 14.02.2023 and 21.02.2023 (Annexure-2) for appointment of an arbitrator, but to no avail. Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.41 of 2023 dt.02-02-2024

4.

It is pleaded that the respondents have not settled the dispute till date and the dispute is of civil in nature.

5.

In the above request case, notice was issued on

19.07.2023 and the Registry has endorsed on 06.09.2023 that it has been served. Since none appeared, a second notice was also issued on 08.09.2023, on which it is reported that service was refused and the process-server, hence affixed the notice on the door. Service is deemed.

6.

Today, there is no dispute about-(a) the legality, validity and binding effect of the written agreement entered into between the parties to the lis; (b) the existence of arbitration clause contained therein; (c) the existence of dispute(s) arising there from; (d) the dispute arising out of the agreement being civil in nature; (e) no legal impediment in the adjudication of the dispute by the learned Arbitrator; (f) Petitioner having exhausted the channel available for resolution of the dispute; (g) the respondent having failed to appoint an Arbitrator pursuant to the invocation of the arbitration clause by the petitioner.

7.

As such, Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. N. Sinha, a former Judge of the Patna High Court, is appointed as learned Arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes arising out of agreement Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.41 of 2023 dt.02-02-2024 entered into between the parties to the lis.

8.

All pleas and issues raised, on merits, are left open to be considered and decided by the learned Arbitrator.

9.

The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee as per the schedule of the Act.

10.

Since the dispute arises out of an agreement of the year 2010, the hearing be expedited.

11.

The issue of limitation, if any, is left open to be raised before the Arbitral Tribunal.

12.

Joint Registrar (List) is directed to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator.

13.

Learned counsel for the parties also undertake to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator.

14.

The Arbitral Tribunal shall issue notice to the respondents.

Operative part

15.

The Request Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) sharun/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

06.02.2024

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Request Petition stands disposed of in the

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Patna High Court, on 02 Feb 2024. The bench was CHIEF.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA REQUEST CASE No. 41 of 2023). ← Search more judgments