SHAILESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 379, 411
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh, Adv Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ORAL ORDER 2 18-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner seeks bail Alauli P.S. Case No. 43 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of trying to flee away along with stolen motorcycle from his house when police party raided his house. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of petitioner. Petitioner is is custody since 24.01.2022. From perusal of para 3 of the petition, it appears that petitioner has criminal history and has been earlier also involved in similar nature of offence, as such I am not inclined to enlarge Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22418 of 2022(2) dt.18-07-2022 him on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, it is observed that petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.