Ramayan Prasad v. Anandi Devi

Patna High Court SA No.555 of 2009 (13) dt.09-01-2013 Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

2. Bishwanath Prasad S/O Late Jagdish Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

3. Udho Prasad S/O Late Jagdish Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

4. Suman Prasad S/O Late Jagdish Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

5. Ram Prasad S/O Late Jagdish Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

6. Dudhnath Prasad S/O Late Indrasan Mahto R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

7. Sheonath Prasad S/O Madan Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

8. Beshwanath Prasad S/O Madan Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

9. Umesh Prasad S/O Late Madan Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

10. Rajesh Prasad S/O Late Madan Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

11. Dharmendra Pd. S/O Late Madan Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

12. Suganti Kumari D/O Late Madan Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

13. Ramant Kumari D/O Late Madan Prasad R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

14. Wakil S/O Doma Matho R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

15. Rambahrosa Mahto S/O Doma Matho R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

16. Dhanraj Mahto S/O Lakshman Mahto R/O Vill- Bijaihate, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

17. Phulmati Devi W/O Lakha Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

18. Jotia Devi D/O Lakho Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan 3 Patna High Court SA No.555 of 2009 (13) dt.09-01-2013

19. Keshoreja Devi D/O Lakho Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

20. Sheokumari Devi D/O Lakho Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

21. Most. Elaichi W/O Late Yamuna Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

22. Phulmato Devi W/O Manager Mahto R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

23. Sharda Devi W/O Berendra Prasad, D/O Roshan Mahto R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

24. Most. Kabutara Devi W/O Hardeo Prasad R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

25. Dru Prasad S/O Hardeo Prasad R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

26. Jai Bhagat S/O Mauni Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

27. Madan Bhagat S/O Mauni Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

28. Babunand Bhagat S/O Mauni Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

29. Bacha Bhagat S/O Mauni Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

30. Shri Ram Bhagat S/O Ganesh Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

31. Manakya Bhagat S/O Ganesh Bhagat R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

32. Panpati Devi R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

33. Ardi Devi W/O Kadash Prasad R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

34. Ashok Kumar Minor S/O Kailash Prasad Represented By Mother Arti Devi R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

35. Dilip Kumar Minor S/O Kailash Prasad Represented By Mother Arti Devi R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

36. Pradip Kumar Minor S/O Kailash Prasad Represented By Mother Arti Devi R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan 4 Patna High Court SA No.555 of 2009 (13) dt.09-01-2013

37. Mina Kumari Minor D/O Kailash Prasad Represented By Mother Arti Devi R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

38. Rekha Kumari Minor D/O Kailash Prasad Represented By Mother Arti Devi R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

39. Chhathiya Devi W/O Ramnath Mahto R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

40. Lakshmina Kumari Minor D/O Ramnath Mahto Through Most. Chhathiya Devi Mother And Guardian R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

41. Panawa Kumari Minor D/O Ramnath Mahto Through Most. Chhathiya Devi Mother And Guardian R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

42. Jawahir Prasad Minor S/O Ramnath Mahto Through Most. Chhathiya Devi Mother And Guardian R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

43. Mira Kumari Minor D/O Ramnath Mahto Through Most. Chhathiya Devi Mother And Guardian R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

44. Deenanath Mahto S/O Late Manager Mahto R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan

45. Brajesh Prasad Minor S/O Hardeo Pd. Through Bejai Kumar Sinha And Guardian R/O Vill- Bejaihata, P.S. Pachrukhi, Distt. Siwan ====================================================== .... .... Respondent/s Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rekesh Mr. Umesh Kr. Singh Mr. Poonam Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 Patna High Court SA No.555 of 2009 (13) dt.09-01-2013 12 09-01-2013 Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, learned counsel for the appellants. The present appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been placed for hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 C.P.C. The appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 8-9-2009 passed by learned 3rd. Additional District and Sessions Judge, Siwan in Title Appeal No. 27/83/20/2009 whereby he has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 14-1- 1983 passed by learned Ist. Munsif, Siwan in Title Suit No. 178/1972, which was filed for declaration of title and confirmation of possession of the plaintiffs over the suit land with a further relief that the defendants be restrained from interfering with peaceful possession of the disputed land by way of permanent injunction. The trial court decreed the suit in part in favour of the plaintiffs holding in respect of plot nos. 397,306, 308 and 311; total admeasuring area 5 katha 3 dhurs on contest against the contesting defendants and exparte against rest major defendants and dismissed the suit against the minor defendants. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has not been able to point out any perversity in the findings of the court below. The only question which has been raised in course of hearing the present 6 Patna High Court SA No.555 of 2009 (13) dt.09-01-2013 appeal is that the suit before the court below was barred by the principle of res-judicata. On going through the orders of the court below particularly the order of the learned Ist. Appellate Court I find that the issue was duly considered in paragraph-8 and the findings of the court below do not warrant any interference. As I do not find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal, the appeal is accordingly dismissed. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Naresh/-