Gorelal Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 399, 402
- Arms Act, 1959
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Upendra Kumar : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sarmera P.S. Case No. 111 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, five miscreants were apprehended with arms and ammunition and it is alleged that these petitioners fled away from the place of occurrence after seeing the police party. It is submitted that no arms and ammunition or any incriminating article has been recovered from possession of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20673 of 2022(2) dt.05-09-2022 these petitioners. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners above- named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 111 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.