Ranjeet Kumar Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120, 420
- Essential Commodities Act s. 7
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Operative part
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma Mr. ORAL ORDER 3 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Palasi P. S. Case No. 1 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner, in all the cases, has produced the order dated 07.12.2021 passed by the District Agriculture Officer, Araria by which the licence of the petitioners have been restored. Considered the facts of these cases. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28249 of 2021(3) dt.24-03-2022 In these circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Palasi P. S. Case No. 1 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shakir/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120, 420; Essential Commodities Act — s. 7; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.