SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 363, 366(A)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 164, 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Hans Lal Kumar Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman ORAL ORDER 2 10-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 236 of 2018, registered for the offences punish- able under Sections 363, 366 (A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. From perusal of the order of Additional Sessions Judge- VIIIth, Sitamarhi dated 26.02.2021, it transpires that the victim in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that she has sol- emnized her marriage with the present petitioner and out of wedlock she has a daughter of one and half years. She has also stated that none has kidnapped her. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circum- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28381 of 2021(2) dt.10-03-2022 stances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on an- ticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thou- sand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 236 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down un- der Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the pe- titioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.