Sarvesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 341, 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Jyoti Prasad : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., these two petitioners assaulted informant and his brother with spade and Khanti.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners and informant are cousin brothers and due to land dispute, the scuffle took place between them. Injuries, allegedly caused by petitioners, are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21342 of 2025(2) dt.29-04-2025
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Considering the nature of injury and clean antecedent, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 407 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.