✦ Patna High Court

Dashrath Rai v. Jaleshwar Turha & Ors.

Civil Revision No. 1126 of 2009V NATH

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that by the impugned order the court below has debarred the petitioner from filing the written statement and as such it is interlocutory in nature. She has submitted the revision application is not maintainable and prays for permission to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks’ time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Roy/- (V.Nath,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision No. 1126 of 2009). ← Search more judgments