✦ Patna High Court

JAI LAL CHARMKAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 26739 of 2008CHANDRAMAULI PRASAD

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Application stands dismissed with the observation

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh, appears on behalf of the petitioner. The Union of India is represented by Mr.Prashant Kashyap, Central Government Counsel. Petitioner earlier came to this Court for grant of bail and by order dated 29.4.2008 passed in Cr.Misc. No.5283 of 2008, I had rejected his prayer. Without approaching the court below, petitioner has chosen to file this application before this Court again. On this ground alone, I am not inclined to entertain the prayer of the petitioner. Petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail before the court below itself. Application stands dismissed with the observation aforesaid. (Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.) Narendra/

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Application stands dismissed with the observation

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Customs Act, 1962 — s. 135(i)(b).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 26739 of 2008). ← Search more judgments