Lakhisarai v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr.Mayank Bilochan, Advocate Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ORAL ORDER 2 14-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with G.R.P. Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 91/2023 lodged on 12.10.2023 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1- B)a/26 (i) 35 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against three unknown accused persons, including the present petitioner with an allegation of committing robbery on the point of pistol.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is not named in the FIR, but he has been arrested only Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17467 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 on the basis of suspicion. Besides this, neither any incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put on the Test Identification Parade. The petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2023 and is accused in one more criminal case, in which he is on bail.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Rail Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.