Balram Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 109, 120(B)
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ss. 13(1)(d), 13(2)
- Electricity Act, 2003 ss. 39, 44
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr.Gopal Prasad Roy Mr.Rama Kant Sharmal.O,I/C Vigilance ORAL ORDER 5 28-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 12.12.2014 passed by learned Special Judge, Vigilance II, Patna in Special Case No. 14/2001 by which cognizance for the offences punishable under Section 109/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 13(2) read with 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 as well as under Section 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 16/2001 has been taken against the petitioner and other. After having gone through the records of the case, the present application for quashing the order dated 12.12.2014 passed by learned Special Judge, Vigilance II, Patna in Special Case No. 14/2001 is dismissed with an observation that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21053 of 2015(5) dt.28-02-2023 petitioner may raise all his grounds at the stage of framing of charge. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/-Sunny U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.