Shyam Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 354, 363, 366, 366A, 376
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 161, 164
Judgment
Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP 3 22-08-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A of the Indian Penal Code but the police after investigation submitted chargesheet under Sections 366, 376, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 23.02.2019, unknown persons are alleged to have kidnapped the daughter of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17204 of 2022(3) dt.22-08-2022 the informant for the purpose of marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the alleged date of occurrence is 23.02.2019 whereas the present F.I.R. was instituted on 03.03.2019 after a long gap without explanation of any delay. He further submits that the statement of the victim was recorded under Section 161 of the Cr. P.C. on 12.06.2019 and subsequently her statement under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. was recorded on 15.06.2019. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.01.2022. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the victim girl was recovered and the statement of the victim girl was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. in which she has categorically supported the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. and medical report also confirms the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Vidyapatinagar P.S. Case No. 25 of 2019 pending in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17204 of 2022(3) dt.22-08-2022 Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 3rd, Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur. Prayer is refused. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.