Sarjesh Kumar @ Sushant Kumar @ Sanjesh Kumar @ Sushant Raj v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Outcome
Withdrawn
application is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 82, 83
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Rishabh/- U T (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr. Shubhesh Pandey Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy ORAL ORDER 4 05-09-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, very fairly submits that process under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. has been issued against the petitioner and thus seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Operative part
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Rishabh/- U T (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 82, 83.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.