✦ Patna High Court

Shambhu Manjhi @ Shambhu Saran Manjhi v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 26203 of 2024PURNENDU SINGH2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

: : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH Mr. Shivnanadan Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP 2 01-05-2024 Heard Mr. Shivnanadan Singh, learned Senior ORAL ORDER counsel, along with Mr. Abhishek Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 03 of 2023 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioner, had fired at the informant, as a result of which, he sustained head injury.

4.

Mr. Shivnanadan Singh, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is previous enmity between the parties, as would appear from Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26203 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 paragraph no.3 of the bail application as the informant of the present FIR or his relative has lodged altogether four cases against the petitioner, in which petitioner is on bail. Carried by his personal whims and to threaten the petitioner, the informant has dragged the petitioner by lodging false cases against him.

5.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6.

Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the fact that the informant and the petitioner are co-villagers and they are in inimical terms. Altogether, four FIRs have been lodged against the petitioner by the informant and his family members, prior to lodging the present FIR. There is case and counter-case arising out of the said incidence, in which the petitioner has sustained grievous injuries on his leg and the petitioner, without any intention, in his self-defence, may have caused some injuries to the informant. I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7.

The District Court is directed to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26203 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Banka in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 03 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

8.

The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner, as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically. (Purnendu Singh, J.) Ashishsingh/- U T

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 26203 of 2024). ← Search more judgments