DINA NATH JHA v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NAVIN SINHA
Judgment
learned counsel for the State. That daily wagers do not hold a post under the Government and have no claim for regularization, stands well explained in Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 as further explained in (2010) 3 SCC 115 (STATE OF KARNATAKA Versus CHAYA NAYAK AND OTHERS). No relief can be claimed on basis of a panel of the year-1992. If an advertisement is published and the petitioners apply in response to the same their cases are required to be considered in accordance with law when this Court expects that the State, as a matter of policy, shall consider issue of age relaxation, past experience etc. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.