Raju Prashad @ Raju Prasad, male v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application stands disposed off accordingly
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 379, 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Raju Prashad @ Raju Prasad, male, aged about 36 years, Son of Lalan Prasad
Vinay Kumar @ Binay Prasad, male, aged about 29 years, Son of Lalan Prasad Both are R/o Village- Dular Patti, Misir Tola, Police Station- Yogapatti, Dist.- West Champaran. The State of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ====================================================== ... ... Opposite Party/s Appearance : For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 24-05-2022 Heard Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra, the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State. Mr. Mishra, the learned Advocate for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application with respect to petitioner No. 2, namely, Vinay Kumar @ Binay Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24082 of 2021(2) dt.24-05-2022 Prasad as he has been arrested during the pendency of this bail application. Permission is granted. The application with respect to petitioner No. 2 is dismissed as having become infructuous. The petitioner No. 1, namely, Raju Prashad @ Raju Prasad, seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Yogapatti (Sanichari) P.S. Case No. 329 of 2020, dated
Operative part
08.08.2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner No. 1 that though he is said to have assaulted the informant by means of a farsa, but the injuries received by him have been reported to be simple in nature and caused by hard and blunt substance. Apart from this, it has been submitted that in the counter case, persons from the side of the prosecution have been granted anticipatory bail. Regard being had to the facts afore-stated, the petitioner No. 1, namely, Raju Prashad @ Raju Prasad, in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24082 of 2021(2) dt.24-05-2022 the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Yogapatti (Sanichari) P.S. Case No. 329 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The application stands disposed off accordingly. Praveen-II/- U T (Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands disposed off accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 379, 504; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.