Shivshankar Kumar @ Shiv Shankar Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 304B
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. I do not find any compelling or changed circumstance to consider the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner for the second time and, therefore, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) HR/- U T
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA Mr.Raja Surendra Mohan Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ORAL ORDER 3 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC in connection with Sakra P.S.Case No. 325 of
The petitioner had earlier moved for grant of anticipatory bail before the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Muzaffarpur, vide Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1810/2018, which was rejected. Thereafter, the petitioner had moved before this Court for grant of anticipatory bail, vide Cr. Misc. No. 5125/2019 which was also rejected on 27.03.2019. Thereafter, for the second time, the petitioner again moved the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur for grant of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14983 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 anticipatory bail, vide A.B.P. No. 3656/2025, which has again been dismissed on 08.12.2025.
The FIR was lodged as far back as in 2017. This is the second attempt for grant of anticipatory bail before this Court.
Operative part
I do not find any compelling or changed circumstance to consider the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner for the second time and, therefore, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) HR/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 304B.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.