Md. Azad Alam @ Amin Faizi @ Md. Amin Faizi @ Azad v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 406, 419, 420
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Operative part
====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Md. Ziaul Quamar, Advocate Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, A.P.P. 2 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that after taking consideration money of Rs. 10,05,000/- from the informant, these petitioners neither executed the sale deed in his favour nor refunded the said amount. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have not taken any money from the informant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15282 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 and there is no chit of paper on record in support of the allegation. As a matter of fact, prior to the present case, petitioner No. 3 filed Araria (R.S.) P. S. Case No. 348 of 2021 against the informant and others and only with a view to save his skin, this false and concocted case has been filed against the petitioners. He further submits that it is a case of civil dispute and petitioners have got clean antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria (R.S.) P. S. Case No. 350 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Navya/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 406, 419, 420; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.