✦ Patna High Court

BITTU KUMAR v. The State of Bihar

Case at a glance

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : For the Opposite Party : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate Mr.Nagendra Prasad, APP ORAL ORDER 2 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections-30(a), 32, 36 & 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution case, in short, is that 2604.12 liters wine is recovered. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 2604.12 liters wine is recovered from different vehicles. None of the vehicles belongs to the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13973 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13-04-2022 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Cr. Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar.) On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 637 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A.K.V.//- U T (Sudhir Singh, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13973 of 2023). ← Search more judgments