✦ Patna High Court

Hira Mahto v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12203 of 2022ANSHUMAN2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
ANSHUMAN

Provisions considered

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr.Rewti Kant Raman, Advocate Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP. ORAL ORDER 4 11-08-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Medani Chowki P.S. Case No. 82 of 2021 lodged under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the petitioner went with the deceased and on the next morning, the dead body of the deceased was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that case has been lodged under Section 302 of the I.P.C. but after investigation charge sheet has been filed under Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12203 of 2022(4) dt.11-08-2022 Section 304 of the I.P.C.. He further submits that none of the witness has supported the version of the F.I.R. He further submits that in paragraph nos.-21 and 22 of the case diary the independent witnesses stated that they have seen that the deceased was taking bath in Quil river after returning from Diara and on the next day his dead body was recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.07.2021, charge sheet has already been filed and charge has been framed as well as he has clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the informant has figured the name of the present petitioner in commission of the crime but on the other hand he also submits that in case diary, there is not a single witness who has supported the story of F.I.R.. In the present facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai in connection with Medani Chowki P.S. Case No. 82 of 2021, in S.T. Case No. 02 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12203 of 2022(4) dt.11-08-2022 under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions: A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall resulted into cancellation of his bail bond. B. One of the bailor shall be close relative who shall file affidavit before the court about his relation with the petitioner. With this observation, the bail application stands allowed. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) ravishankar/- U T

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12203 of 2022). ← Search more judgments