LALMANI DEVI v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 418
Judgment
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner also admits the said fact before this court. In that view of the matter, the consideration made by the lower appellate court cannot be faulted. Further, this Court finds that adequate reasons have been assigned by the learned lower appellate court for acquitting the O.P.Nos.2 and 3 herein. The lower appellate court in paragraph 14 concluded as under:
It is also admitted fact in the case that the prosecution has not been able to compare the L.T.I. of Raja Singh on the said deed of gift with any admitted L.T.I. to show whether it was L.T.I. of Raja Singh or some body else on the said deed of gift. It is also admitted that Title Suit no.32/05 is pending in the court of Munsif, Gaya in which the aforesaid deed of gift is in dispute and the civil court is competent authority to determine the genuineness of the aforesaid deed of gift.
In view of the facts noticed above, this Court finds no patent illegality in the judgment and order which is sought to be appealed against by filing the present application. The application seeking leave to appeal has not merit which is accordingly dismissed.. This Court, however, observes that the result of the present litigation shall not prejudice the case of the plaintiffs of Title Suit No.32/05. ( Kishore K. Mandal )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.