GORAKH SAW v. STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that allegation in the case is about handing over Rs.25,000/- only after obtaining thumb impression on blank paper showing payment of rupees three lacs and fifty thousand. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, full payment was there, that was realized by the informant also and she amicably settled the dispute by filing a compromise. So, I find no justification in petitioners’ arrest at the moment. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Piro P.S.Case No.297/2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.