TAJUDDIN @ MD. TAJUDDIN v. The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta ORAL ORDER 2 12-09-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 154 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the stolen mobile set was not recovered from the possession of the present petitioner rather it was recovered from the possession of co- accused Abdul Rahim who stated in his statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. that he had purchased the said mobile from co-accused Md. Arman. He has also submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9902 of 2022(2) dt.12-09-2022 Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Sitamarhi in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 154 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T