Vibha Kumari v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MADHURESH PRASAD
Outcome
Dismissed
Writ application is dismissed with liberty
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Writ application is dismissed with liberty. uttam/- U (Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD Mr.Sita Ram Prasad, Adv Mr.Devendra Kumar, Adv : : 2 10-08-2023 The order of DPO dated 09.07.2022 has been ORAL ORDER challenged. By the said order, the petitioner’s claim for being selected in place of private Respondent No. 06 as Aanganwadi Sevika to Centre No. 122 has been disallowed.
It is not in dispute that the Directorate of Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) has issued guidelines for selection of Aanganwadi Sevika/Sahayika wherein the remedy of revision has been provided before the Divisional Commissioner against the order of the DPO.
This Court is of the opinion that in view of such Patna High Court CWJC No.3666 of 2023(2) dt.10-08-2023 adequate efficacious remedy wherein all disputed issues being raised in the instant proceedings can be considered by the authorities, there is no occasion for this court to exercise its extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy in accordance with the guidelines.
Operative part
Writ application is dismissed with liberty. uttam/- U (Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ application is dismissed with liberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.