Patna v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 498A
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Shobha Devi Wife of Amarjeet Kumar @ Chintu R/o Village-Andhra Chowki, P.S.-Bikram, District-Patna, at present residing at daughter of Harendra Prasad, R/o Srinagar Mashauri, P.S.-Mashauri, District-Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mr.Binay Kumar Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan 5 28-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 323, 498A, of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2., is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9443 of 2020(5) dt.28-02-2022 tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.154(c) of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C., If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. devendra/- U T (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.