✦ Patna High Court

Reshma Sajid v. The State of Bihar

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 2958 of 2023ANIL KUMAR SINHA2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
ANIL KUMAR SINHA

Provisions considered

Judgment

8.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, District- Katihar. The Director, Bihar Education Project, Shikha Bhawan, Reshtra Bhasha Parishad Campus, Patna. The Director, Jan Shiksha Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. The District Magistrate, Katihar, District- Katihar. The District Education Officer, Katihar. The District Programme Officer, Katihar. The Block Education Officer, Block- Dandkhora, District- Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA Mr.Pravin Chandra Prasad Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra ( Sc 16 ) : : 2 22-12-2023 Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned. ORAL ORDER The petitioner is seeking appointment as Tola Sewak. The Tola Sewak is appointed under the scheme on contract basis for one year. The post of Tola Sewak is not statutory and no recruitment rules are followed for their appointment. A coordinate Bench of this Court, in the similar matter of Tola Sewak, in CWJC No. 18107 of 2016, has held as follows:- “The learned counsel for the Patna High Court CWJC No.2958 of 2023(2) dt.22-12-2023 respondents has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present writ petition and has referred to a judgment dated

17.08.2015 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWJC No. 12390 of 2015 as well as to a judgment dated 02.02.2017 rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 2185 of 2015 whereby and whereunder it has been held that since the selection or engagement or hiring of the Tola Sevak is not a permanent appointment under the State, which is required to be considered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as well as since the post of Tola Sevak is under a scheme, the same does not create any statutory right in favour of the petitioner, hence writ petitions in such matters as that of Tola Sevaks are not maintainable. Having regard to the aforesaid judgments rendered by a coordinate Bench of this Court as also by the learned Division Bench of this Court, this Court is of the opinion that the present writ petition is not maintainable, hence the same is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are available under the law.” The order passed by the co-ordinate Bench presided over by Hon’ble Single Judge in the aforesaid writ application has been affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court, holding Patna High Court CWJC No.2958 of 2023(2) dt.22-12-2023 that the writ petition is not maintainable. Taking into consideration the aforesaid judgment of this Court and the fact that Tola Sewak does not hold civil post as well as the same is not a statutory post, I also come to the conclusion that the writ application is not maintainable. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 2958 of 2023). ← Search more judgments