Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ORAL ORDER 2 17-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise PS Case No. 486 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.
As per the prosecution case, total 684 liters illegal liquor has been recovered from Makhwa Chaur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has not arrested on the spot and he has surrendered before the trial Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9374 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 Court. Petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2024.
Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise-2nd, Begusarai in connection with Excise PS Case No. 486 of 2023.
The trial Court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 (fifteen days) from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the charge-sheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall be released on bail on above conditions and he shall be present physically on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the proceeding of framing of charge. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr. U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.