✦ Patna High Court

Ascensive Educare Ltd v. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna- 01

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 2647 of 2026SUDHIR SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

Case at a glance

Bench
SUDHIR SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

Outcome

Disposed of

present writ application stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sudhir Singh, J) ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T

Judgment

3.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna- 01. The Secretary, Youth Employment and Skill Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. The Mission Director, Bihar Skill Development Mission, Department of Labour Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna- 01. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State

Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, Advocate Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG-5 : : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 2 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties

2.

Following reliefs are sought for in the present application: “(a) For issuance of Writ in nature of Certiorari quashing the Letter No. BSDM/ Domain- 108/2025/ 2603 dated

27.11.2025 (Annexure P/16) passed by Respondent No. 3 wherein the Petitioner Company has been blacklisted for next two years without considering the facts and circumstances of the case. Patna High Court CWJC No.2647 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 (b) For any other relief or reliefs which the petitioners may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation vide Annexure-P/17 dated 29.12.2025 before the respondent no. 2 for redressal of its grievance.

4.

Considering the aforesaid submission, respondent no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders, shall pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Operative part

5.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

6.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sudhir Singh, J) ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: present writ application stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 2647 of 2026). ← Search more judgments