Kamal Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUDHIR SINGH
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 ss. 30(a), 41(i)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 100, 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH Mr.Murari Sharan Tiwari, Advocate Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP ORAL ORDER 2 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that 54 liters wine is recovered. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The names of the petitioners have transpired in this case as Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7917 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 the alleged recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioners where the other family members also reside.
Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 54 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the order dated 13-04-2022 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Cr. Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar). On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Dhaka P.S. case No.374 of 2022, subject to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7917 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/- U T (Sudhir Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.