✦ Patna High Court

SANJEEV KUMAR THAKUR v. STATE OF BIHAR & Anr.

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 21148 of 2009MANDHATA SINGH

Case at a glance

Bench
MANDHATA SINGH

Provisions considered

Judgment

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegation for torture is due to non-fulfilment of dowry but continuation of the same after 16 years of marriage is not believable for rejection of anticipatory bail. In the circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Complaint Case No. 1880 of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 21148 of 2009). ← Search more judgments