JITENDRA DAS v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 366A
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the fact that the matter has already been compromised between the parties, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks…
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State For the Informant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate Mr. Surendra Kumar, A.P.P. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kumar, Advocate : : : 3 10-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State.
Earlier, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner stood rejected vide order dated 09.09.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38698 of 2019.
Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter between the parties has been compromised vide compromise petition annexed as Annexure-3 to the bail application. This petitioner and the victim girl have solemnized marriage and they are living together as husband and wife. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12536 of 2024(3) dt.10-04-2024 Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
Learned counsel for the Informant does not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioner.
Considering the fact that the matter has already been compromised between the parties, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Narpatganj P. S. Case No. 39 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Navya/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.