Nand Lal Prasad Singh v. National Highways Aurhotiry Of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition stand disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. The writ petition stand disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Guddu/- U
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY Mr.Kumar Malendu Mr.S.C.Yadav-Gp15 : : 2 15-04-2024 Heard the parties. ORAL ORDER
That this is a petition for issuance of writ/ order or direction in the nature of mandamus for the following reliefs:- I. Directing the Respondents-authorities to pay the amount of compensation to the petitioner as per the Valuation of the land/house as contained in report dated
21.07.2017 (Annexure-3) on account of being acquired for construction of National Highways No. 82 (Biharshariff- Barbhiga- Patna High Court CWJC No.13441 of 2017(2) dt.15-04-2024 Mokamaha Section) as published in Extra Ordinary Gazette of India on 30.10.2015 and published in Prabhat Khabar. Patna Edition a Hindi daily on 13.05 2016 (Annexure-1) of Mouza Keoti in the district Sheikhpura. II. Directing the Respondents to apply provisions of rehabilitation and resettlement as envisaged under Section 31 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition. Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short the Act 2013). III. Any other relief and reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled to.
A counter affidavit has been filed in the year 2018 on behalf of the respondent, District Land Acquisition Officer, Sheikhpura and as per paragraph-7, the Plot No. 1900 has been shown as Gairmajrua Aam Garha in the Khatiyan.
Copy of the reply was served upon learned counsel for the petitioner on 26.04.2018 and 6 years later, there is no such rebuttal. Patna High Court CWJC No.13441 of 2017(2) dt.15-04-2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner simply wants its disposal of the writ petition with liberty to agitate the matter.
Such liberty is always available to a citizen much less the petitioner.
Operative part
The writ petition stand disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Guddu/- U
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition stand disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Land Acquisition. Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.