AJAY KUMAR v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 120(B), 419, 420, 467, 468, 471
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Indu Bhushan Mr. Ram Naresh Ray ORAL ORDER 2 20-01-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 498 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the present petitioner is that by producing forged certificate of B.Ed., he became successful in obtaining employment as Block Teacher. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16938 of 2021(2) dt.20-01-2022 the petitioner has already been suffering from punishment of retrenchment from service. He has also submitted that in the similar cases, other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the coordinate Benches of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 4306 of 2017, Cr. Misc. No. 1980 of 2017, Cr. Misc. No.51657 of 2014 and Cr. Misc. No. 4759 of 2015, vide orders dated 13.02.2017, 21.02.2017 and 14.05.2015. Considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances, specially the other co-accused persons have been granted bail by the coordinate Benches of this Court, the let petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 498 of 2020, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) Mahesh/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 120(B), 419, 420, 467, 468, 471; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 13 Feb 2017. The bench was NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.