GANESH YADAV v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 341, 354, 379, 448, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Kumari Shubham Mr.A.G. ORAL ORDER 2 13-01-2022 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, through Video Conferencing. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Pandaul Police Station Case No. 274 of 2020 dated
26.10.2020, corresponding to C.R.I. No. 2197 of 2020, disclosing offences under Sections 448, 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation, the accused persons named in the FIR including the present petitioner, entered into the house of the informant and badly assaulted him. The further allegation is that they also outraged the modesty of the female family members of the informant and took away Rs. 25,000/- after breaking the lock of Almira. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15101 of 2021(2) dt.13-01-2022 that there is case and counter case and the members of petitioner’s side have also sustained injuries in the free fight. He has further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he assaulted the informant on his head. The injury report of informant is annexed with the record which shows that all the injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substances. Learned Addl. P.P. has opposed and the prayer for bail. Considering the aforementioned fact and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Madhubani, in connection with Pandaul Police Station Case No. 274 of 2020, corresponding to C.R.I. No. 2197 of 2020, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) sanjeev/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.