Manraj Choudhary @ Maniraj Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 341, 354, 379, 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/
16.02.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The accusations are of making assault, committing theft and abusing by calling caste name. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners’ side sent legal notice to the husband of the informant on 14.06.2011 for not Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4980 of 2012 (2) dt.16-02-2012 transferring in spite of receiving consideration money whereas the present case has been lodged on 18.10.2011, which clouds the bonafide of the accusation. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 219 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.