✦ Patna High Court

Samastipur v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5419 of 2022PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Permission is accorded. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. anay/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Judgment

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-677 Year-2019 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District- Samastipur ====================================================== MAHADEO PASWAN S/o Late Lakhi Paswan R/o village- Rahmatpur, P.s.- Samastipur (M), District- Samastipur Versus ... ... Petitioner/s The State of Bihar JYOTI DEVI D/O RAMESHWAR PASWAN R/o village- Rahmatpur, P.S.- Samastipur (M), District- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr.Bijay Bhushan Prasad Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai 2 21-02-2024 This petition has been filed against order dated

06.12.2021 passed in S.T.No. 409/2019, arising out of Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 677/2019, by the learned A.D.J.-V, Samastipur whereby the petition filed under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. for discharge of petitioner has been rejected.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition.

3.

Permission is accorded. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. anay/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5419 of 2022). ← Search more judgments