Sajan Yadav @ Abdesh Kumar @ Avdesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 341, 386, 427, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 99. The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T
Judgment
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr.Sarbottam Kumar Sarkar Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ORAL ORDER 2 06-03-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.1, namely, Sajan Yadav @ Abdesh Kumar @ Avdesh Yadav.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no.1, namely, Sajan Yadav @ Abdesh Kumar @ Avdesh Yadav.
The petitioner no.2 seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 386, 307, 427, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9271 of 2024(2) dt.06-03-2024
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner no.2 has antecedent of one case and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the allegation of assault against the petitioner is not specific and on account of dispute relating to land, the present occurrence is alleged to have taken place.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 1, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Bheja P. S. Case No.23 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.