✦ Patna High Court

Anita Gupta v. The State of Bihar

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 2808 of 2026MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already received a notice for payment of penalty and release of the vehicle in terms of the provisions contained in Rule 12(A)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules…

Judgment

8.

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State

Mr.Amarnath Jha, Adv. Mr. Subash Prasad Singh, GA-3 Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, AC to GA-3 : : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 3 23-03-2026 The present writ petition has been filed for release of Mahindra/Bolero/pick up van bearing Registration No. BR-11 GD-5720, Chassis No. MA1ZN2TNKL1L53703 and Engine No. TNL1K64951, which has been seized in connection with Saharsa (Prohibition & Excise) P.S.Case No. 258 /2025, dated

2.7.2025, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 on account of recovery of 420 liters of illicit Codeine Phosphate & Triprolidine cough Patna High Court CWJC No.2808 of 2026(3) dt.23-03-2026 syrup.

2.

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already received a notice for payment of penalty and release of the vehicle in terms of the provisions contained in Rule 12(A)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2023, hence the petitioner be either granted liberty to pay the said amount of penalty and get the vehicle in question released or challenge the same, by taking recourse to the due process of law. Liberty so sought is granted.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to challenge the order dated

21.2.2026, passed by the Ld. Court of District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Saharsa in Confiscation Case No. 249 /2025, by filing appropriate appeal under Section 92 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, if so advised. Liberty, so sought, is also granted.

Operative part

4.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Ajay/- U

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 — s. 30(a); Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 — s. 92.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 2808 of 2026). ← Search more judgments