Surya Kumar @ Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER Mr. Mayank Bilochan, Advocate Ms. Asha Devi, APP 2 12-02-2025 Heard Mr. Mayank Bilochan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Asha Devi, learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 979 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 25.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons hit the informant with lathi, danda, iron rod due to which he sustained injuries.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that there is no specific allegation of any assault or Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3502 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 overt act attributed against the petitioner rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and the injury report f the injured persons suggests that the injuries are simple in nature.
Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apart from that the petitioner has participated in the present crime in question as well as petitioner also carries two more cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 979 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3502 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.