✦ Patna High Court

SHATRUGHAN PASWAN v. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 32792 of 2009MANDHATA SINGH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

anticipatory bail is allowed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. There is property dispute in between the parties. They are Gotia. Aunt of the informant is dead. Co-accused Matukdhari is the assailant of the deceased on her head which was found fatal. Petitioner has been alleged for causing assault to other family members that also by means of Lathi. In the discussed facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Agion (Garhani) P.S.Case No.45/2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: anticipatory bail is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 32792 of 2009). ← Search more judgments