Pramila Devi @ Sheela Devi v. Hazpurwa, P.O. Raghopur
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Outcome
Disposed of
This application stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 1313. Sita Ram Roy, son of Late Gulchan Ray, R/o village – Hazipur, P.S. - Judawanpur, P.S. - Judawanpur, district – Vaishali. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER Mr.Amaresh…
Judgment
The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur.
The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hazipur.
The District Magistrate, Vaishali, Hazipur.
The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali, Hazipur.
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vaishali, Hazipur.
S.H.O. Judawanpur Police Station, District - Vaishali, Hazipur.
Ambika Roy.
Raja Roy.
Surendra Roy.
Nanhak Roy. All resp. 9 to 12 are sons of Sri Depi Roy. All resp. no. 9 to 12 are resident of village – Judawanpur Barari, P.S. - Judawanpur, District – Vaishali.
Sita Ram Roy, son of Late Gulchan Ray, R/o village – Hazipur, P.S. - Judawanpur, P.S. - Judawanpur, district – Vaishali. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER Mr.Amaresh Kumar, Advocate Mr.Iqbal Asif Niazi, AC to GP-5 : : 2 03-11-2022 Although by filing this writ application the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to protect the life and property of the petitioner from the hands of respondent no. 9 to 12, this Court finds from the materials available on the record that the petitioner and the private respondents are litigating over the said piece of land in Title Suit No. 742/2015 Patna High Court CR. WJC No.777 of 2017(2) dt.03-11-2022 presently pending in the learned Sub-Judge – 8, Vaishali at Hajipur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that because of ongoing dispute between the parties over the said piece of land, sometimes law and order problems are arising but the respondent authorities are not even taking care of law and order problems and the complaints made in this regard to the said respondents remained unattended. Learned counsel for the State submits that so far as the dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents are concerned, the same is already pending adjudication in the said suit, therefore at this stage, it would not be a fit case to exercise the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. So far as the other grievance of the petitioner with respect to the maintenance of law and order issue is concerned, the same is definitely a duty of respondent authorities to look into it. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, while this Court would not enter into the merit of the allegations and claim of the petitioner with respect of the land in question, this Court directs respondent no.
Operative part
6 to 8 to take note of the grievance of the petitioner and in case any complaint with Patna High Court CR. WJC No.777 of 2017(2) dt.03-11-2022 regard to the law and order issue is made before the S.H.O. Judawanpur Police Station, the same must be attended to with urgency and in accordance with law. This application stands disposed of accordingly. Rajeev/- (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) U Note: The order sheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading ‘Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period’.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This application stands disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.