✦ Patna High Court

Shyamlal Rai v. Jhaboo Rai Son Sukheshwar Rai, by caste Yadav

AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No. 23 of 1986RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA3 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, the present First Appeal No. 23 of 1986 is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr. U

Judgment

1.

resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO ... ... Appellant/s Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

2.

Rajendra Rai @ Rajinand Rai, Son of Jhaboo Rai, by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

Smt. Bhagmati Devi, Wife of Jhaboo Lal Rai, by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

4.

Mahindra Rai, Son of Ramswarup Rai (dead), by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

5.

Khahru Rai, Son of Mahindra Rai, under guardinaship of Rajendra Singh Advocate Guardian add item appointed through Court, by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran. Patna High Court FA No.23 of 1986(18) dt.18-06-2026

6.

Kishore Son of Mahindra Rai under guardinaship of Rajendra Singh Advocate Guardian add item appointed through Court, by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

7.

Bachha Rai, Son of Mahindra Rai under guardinaship of Rajendra Singh Advocate Guardian add item appointed through Court, by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

8.

Most. Paspatia, Wif eof Mukhlal Rai deceased, Son of Mahindra Rai under guardinaship of Rajendra Singh Advocate Guardian add item appointed through Court, by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

9.

Most. Jugwa, Wife of Jialal Rai deceased, by caste Yadav, occupation Cultivation, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, PS Dhaka, PO Pachpakari via Dhaka, Dist East Champaran.

10.

Smt. Sundari Devi, daughter of Jailal Rai, deceased wife of Jogindra Rai, resident of Village Shivahar, PO and PS Shivahar, Dist Sitamarhi.

11.

Smt. Ashbhagni Devi, daughter of Jialal Rai, wife of Heman Rai alive, resident of Village Dewapur, PS Patahi, PO Khoripakar, Dist East Champaran.

12.

Braj Kishore Rai, Son Late Saryug Rai, resident of Village Rupaulia Tappa Sirauna, Prag Mensi, Dhaka, PO Pachpakari, East Champaran. ====================================================== Appearance : ... ... Respondent/s For the Appellant/s For the Respondent/s : : Mr. Brajesh Nandan Bariar, Advocate None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 18 18-06-2026 Learned counsel for the appellants is present and submits that he is unable to contact with their clients (appellants), in spite of direct notices have been issued to the Patna High Court FA No.23 of 1986(18) dt.18-06-2026 appellants as per office notes dated 15.12.2025. It reveals that the appellants have lost their interest in the present First Appeal.

2. In this circumstances, it appears that the appellants have lost their interest to contest the present First Appeal No. 23 of 1986.

3.

Accordingly, the present First Appeal No. 23 of 1986 is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr. U

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No. 23 of 1986). ← Search more judgments