Shri Sheo Dyal Prasad v. State Bank of India a Bank constituted under the State Bank
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the present First Appeal No. 499 of 1981 is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr. U
Judgment
Versus State Bank of India a Bank constituted under the State Bank of India, Act 1955, having its Central Office at Bombay, a Local Head Office at Patna and Branches All Over India including one at Motihari through Shri R.B. Pandey, Branch Manager, A.D. Branch, Motihari, P.O. and P.S.- Motihari, District- East Champaran. Shri Basudeo Singh, Son of Nathu Singh Resident of Village- Narha Panapur, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. Shri Yogi Singh, Son of Nathu Singh Resident of Village- Narha Panapur, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. Shri Bhagya Narain Singh, Son of Nathu Singh Resident of Village- Narha Panapur, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s For the State Bank of India None Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate : : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 18 04-05-2026 Nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents-Bank is present.
On two dates i.e., on 16.03.2026 and 20.04.2026, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants.
On perusal of the records, it appears that this First Patna High Court FA No.499 of 1981(18) dt.04-05-2026 Appeal is of the year 1981 and the appellants are absented from two dates and even today, on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the appellants to press this application.
4. In view of the above circumstances, it appears that the appellants have lost their interest to contest the present First Appeal No. 499 of 1981.
Accordingly, the present First Appeal No. 499 of 1981 is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr. U
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.