AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21254 of 2012 · Patna High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ASHWANI KUMAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 379, 498A
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21254 of 2012 (2) dt.11-06-2012 Prohibition Act. It is contended that there is no truth behind the allegation made in the complaint. Petitioner no.1 is grand father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is father-in-law, petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are uncle in-laws, petitioner no.5 is brother-in-law (Debar) and petitioner no.6 is aunt in-law, petitioner no.7 is sister-in-law and petitioner nos. 8 and 9 are brother-in-laws. Be that as it may, considering the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with Upahara P.S. Case No. 17 of 2012 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also on the following conditions: (i) That both the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners who will give separate affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners shall not directly or 3 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21254 of 2012 (2) dt.11-06-2012 indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court or to any other authority. (iii) That they shall remain present before the court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If they wants to remain absent, then they shall take prior permission of the court and in case of compelling and unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, they will immediately inform the court and request that they may be permitted to be present through the counsel. (iv) That liberty is given to the State to make appropriate application modifying/recalling the order granting bail, if for any reason, the petitioners violate any of the conditions imposed by this Court. Vinay/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.