MITTAPALLI VENKATA KOTESWARA RAO, ADOPTED v. THE STATE OF A P
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 397, 401
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. With the above direction, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 23.10.2025 Note: Issue C.C. Today B/o M K K
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3258/2017 Between:
1. MITTAPALLI VENKATA KOTESWARA RAO, ADOPTED SON OF VENKATESWARLU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, BUSINESS, BALAJI ROAD, RICE MILL, NARASARAOPET, WITHIN LIMITS OF NARASARAOPET PS VINUKONDA PARBOILED
2. BOLISETTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, SON OF VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NEAR GDCC BANK, R/O. PRAKASHNAGAR, NARSARAOPET TOWN, WITHIN LIMITS OF NARSARAOPET PS.
3. MIRIYALA NARAHARI RAO, ADOPTED SON OF VENKATESWARLU, HINDU, BUSINESS, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, SATTENAPALLI ROAD, NEAR KOTA CENTER,NARSARAOPET TOWN, WITHIN LIMITS OF NARSARAOPET PS. ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD.
2. NEELISETTY VENKATA SRINIVAS SUDHEE, S/O. PRABHAKARA R/O. D. NO. 7-4-59/4, RAO, HINDU, AGED 29 YEARS, NAMBURIVARI BAZAR, NARSARAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT (COMPLAINANT) ...RESPONDENT(S)
: Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the judgment dated.14- 11-2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 414/2014 of the Court of the XIII Addl. District and Sessions Judge Narsaraopeta by confirming the judgment dt.22- 07-2014 in C.C.54/2008 on the file of the I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Narasaraopet and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 5266 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the judgment dated 22-07-2014 in C.C.No.54/2008 on the file of the I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Narsaropeta, Guntur District and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 5267 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 54/2008 on the file of the I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Narsaropeta, Guntur District pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order of Stay granted on 04.01.2018 in Crl. Rc.No. 3258 of 2017 until further orders and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to clarify or extended the interim order passed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 19-02-2018 in CRLRC No.3258/2017 is valid and in force until it is expressly vacated and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.3258 of 2017
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 14.11.2017 passed in Crl.A.No.414 of 2014 on the file of the learned XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet.
Heard both the learned counsel appearing. Learned counsel for the petitioners/accused submits that in pursuance of the settlement of the matter before the Mediator, the 2nd respondent has agreed to take Demand Draft for Rs.8,00,000/-. The said demand draft is handed over to the 2nd respondent through his counsel in the Court.
Perused the terms of the mediator’s report. As per the mediator’s report particularly at clause-G, it contemplates as follows: “As per the settlement, the petitioners are agreed to pay Rs.8,00,000/- to the 2nd respondent, and in return the 2nd respondent agreed to receive Rs.8,00,000/- from the petitioners towards full and final settlement of the case bearing Crl.R.C.No.3258 of 2017.
In view of the settlement arrived at before the mediator, both the parties are directed to appear before the concerned Court below wherein the criminal case is pending and record their compromise.
With the above direction, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 23.10.2025 Note: Issue C.C. Today B/o M K K
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 401; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Oct 2025. The bench was T MALLIKARJUNA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.