S.VENKATESWARLU v. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Apr 2026
- Bench
- HARINATH N
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25155/2013 Between:
1. S.VENKATESWARLU S/O HANUMAIAH, RETIRED RECORD ASST., C/O B.SRINIVASA BABJI, H.NO.3-33-75, 3RD LANE, N.G.O.COLONY, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. HIGHER EDUCATION ITS DEPT,
THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AE, HYDERABAD.
THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
THE S.S. & N COLLEGE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
THE PRINCIPAL, S.S. & N COLLEGE, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, DISTRICT TREASURY, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2
THE ASSISTANT TREASURY OFFICER, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to pay pension and other terminal benefits due to the writ petitioner by declaring the inaction as illegal, arbitrary and violative of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16, 21 and 300-A further violative of Circular Memo No.1469/62/A1/PEN/2010 dt.3.8.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent herein and pass the Constitution of India and IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 31031 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 4 to 6 herein to pay anticipatory pension and anticipatory gratuity to the writ petitioner in terms of Rule 51(A) and (C) of Revised Pension Rules, 1980 pending disposal of the above writ petition and Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V MALLIK Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
2. SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA The Court made the following: Order:- 3 The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing respondents submits that the petitioner and his wife have passed away and that the service benefits were settled in favour of the unmarried daughter, by name Sakila Anuradha, and has placed the relevant proceedings on record.
2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 06.04.2026 PNS
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Apr 2026. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.