✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 23 Dec 2025

KAMMALA RAMAPPA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

D RAMESH4 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, the Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Date: 23.12.2025 SNI __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 6 50 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE…

Judgment

Cause title

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 35828/2025 Between:

1. KAMMALA RAMAPPA, S/O LATE KAMMALA GANGANNA, AGE. 80 YEARS, COOLI, R/O KAMMALAVANDIA BURUJU VILLAGE, PEDABALLE POST AND MANDAL, SATHYA SAI DISTRICT (ERST WHILE ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL A.P. SECRETARIAT, SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB COLLECTOR, DIVISION, MADANAPALLE, REVENUE MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

5. THE TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

6. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, , RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

7. THE SUB REGISTRAR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S)

: 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a), declaring the action of the Respondents herein interfering and trying to dispossess are all most illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, (b). similarly also, insisting for No Objection Certificate/NOC amounts to violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, of non receiving and processing of the documents for registration by the Respondents 6 and 7, thereby direct the Respondents 1 to 5 to remove subject schedule property out of prohibitory properties list for entertaining and release the registered documents by the Respondents 6 and 7 for the present subject schedule property, viz., house plot bearing No.9 situated in Annamayya District (Erstwhile Chittoor District ) - Madanapalle Sub District- Madanapalle Municipality, B.K.Palle Village - 2nd Ward, Kadiri Road, Segment - 2 (Nearby Bypass Road) - S.No.533-2A Paiki Ac.2.26 Cents Paiki Ac.0.76 Cents or 0.307 hectors Paiki - Plot No.9 site with specific boundaries bounded by East Land of others, west Road, North Site in Plot No.10 and south Site in Plot No.8 within these boundaries East -West on both sides 33 feet or 10.065 mts , North-South on both sides 26 feet 4 inches or 8.845 mts - 96.8 Sq yards vacant site- Full, (c). and prays to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to evict the petitioner from the subject schedule viz; house plot bearing No.9 situated in Annamayya District (Erstwhile Chittoor District ) - Madanapalle Sub District- Madanapalle Municipality, B.K.Palle Village - 2^^^ ^ard, Kadiri Road, Segment - 2 (Nearby Bypass Road) - S.No.533-2A Paiki Ac.2.26 Cents Paiki Ac.0.76 Cents or 0.307 hectors Paiki - Plot No.9 site with specific boundaries 4^ bounded by East: Land of others, west: Road, North: Site in Plot No. 10 and south : Site in Plot No.8 within these boundaries East -West on both sides 33 feet or 10.065 mts , North-South on both sides 26 feet 4 inches or 8.845 mts - 96.8 Sq yards vacant site- Full, pending disposal of this main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. ABHISHEK KANYALUR 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 35828 of 2025 The Court made the following

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:

…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus trying (a). declaring the action of the Respondents herein interfering illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, to dispossess are all most (b). similarly also, insisting for No Objection Certificate/NOC amounts to violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, of non receiving and processing of the documents for registration by the Respondents 6 and 7, thereby direct the Respondents 1 to 5 to remove subject schedule property out of prohibitory properties list for entertaining and release the registered documents by the Respondents 6 and 7 for the present subject schedule property viz house plot bearing No 9 situated in Annamayya District (Erstwhile Chittoor District) - Madanapalle Sub District - Madanapalle Municipality, B.K.Palle Village - 2nd Ward, Kadiri Road, Segment - 2 (Nearby Bypass Road) – S.No.533-2A Paiki Ac.2.26 Cents Paiki Ac.0.76 Cents or 0.307 hectors Paiki - Plot No.11 site with specific boundaries bounded by East: Land and houses of others, west: Road, North: Site in Plot No.10 and South: Site in Plot No.8 within these boundaries East-West on both sides 33 feet or 10.065 mts, North-South on both sides 26 feet 4 inches or 8.845 mts – 96.8 Sq yards vacant site Full and prays and pass...…

2.

Heard learned counsel the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 5

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition.

4.

Permission accorded.

5.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Date: 23.12.2025 SNI __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 6 50 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35828 OF 2025 Dt.23.12.2025 SNI

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226, 300A; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Dec 2025. The bench was D RAMESH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments